Listen, forgive me if I was too harsh, I was excessively caught up in other matters. Steerpike 18:30, 17 January 2006 (UTC) Reply I combat inane editing on Sonic articles almost daily, and often it makes me wonder the point of this whole encyclopaedia. Yeah maybe that's arrogant but look it up in the history. About 60% of them wouldn't look so nice if I hadn't written them. I've done A LOT of work on Sonic articles, I would even say the bulk. And btw you jumping to conclusions about us shows more about your opinion than editing a line does about ours. If Game Rankings and Gamespot said it, re-insert the line and back it up with a link. And if you don't (and simply want to add a trivia bit), at least try to cite sources. Like I said, if you want critical opinions in the article, then add that section. It's customary to do your research before editing something in. QUOTE: I only want everyone to think (and research), before they edit! Which is exactly what I'm saying, only it doesn't work like "innocent until proven guilty". I can't differentiate between real and bogus editing if no-one ever bothers to cite sources. Sometimes blatantly so (BEST GAME EVARR), sometimes presented as if it's general consensus (many gamers think this is the best game ever), but wording it a little different doesn't make it more factual. The point is that people (especially video game fanatics) come to Wikipedia to praise their favourite games all the time. Wikipedia is there to provide factual information so that's what I'm interested in. And second, I don't really care whether critics think this is the worst or the best Sonic game in the series.
I am not trying to be rude, I only want everyone to think (and research), before they edit!įor starters it would be nice if you signed your comments with four tildes (like this -~~~~). It is almost like a ring of people have banded together to "bully" others out of editing. You heard me correctly! Every time I or many others make edits, I find virtually the same people editing them out, to suite their own taste. I am starting to believe Wikipedia is one big conspiracy. If you find something that does not please you, but is factual, you do not have the right to edit it out, and call it bias! The fact that you edited this truthful statement, basically shows your opinion. Why did you edit this? Is this what you do, randomly pick articles, and edit out positive information that is true? Wikipedia is everyone's encyclopedia. All of this information, is fully credible (and proven). Additionally, he stated it was not the best selling. The individual who wrote it, said it was "one of the best," not the best. I did not make this statement, but I find it humerous, that ya'll disagree with it. Go to Game Rankings, Gamespot, anywhere, and they'll tell you it is one of the best. The statement that, "Sonic CD is considered to be one of the best games in the series," is far from irrelevant. Has it suddenly become the norm, for every innocent man to be entailed to such brutal psychological misdemeanor? I myself am not a "die-hard" fan of this game, but I know enough to tell you are wrong.
0 kommentar(er)
